The team

Built to solve something real

We believe the AI era will produce two kinds of professionals: those who borrowed a brain, and those who sharpened their own. We are building the tools to make sharp thinking the default — not the exception.

This is not just a productivity play. It is a response to a civilisational challenge. As AI reshapes every knowledge profession, the premium on genuine judgment — the ability to reason clearly when the data is noisy, the room is political, and the stakes are real — has never been higher. We built Critelligence because we saw what happens when it is missing, and we decided that was not good enough.

Christine G.
CEO

Christine G. started as a technical operator, earned her stripes as COO, and now leads Critelligence as CEO. She built things before she managed them, which means she has little patience for strategy that does not survive contact with reality. She started Critelligence because she watched too many smart people outsource their thinking to tools that could not be held accountable — and decided to do something about it.

Markus K., COO of Critelligence
Markus K.
COO

Markus K. is the rare kind of operator who can read a data model and a room with equal ease. He brings technical depth and an exceptional network to Critelligence — the person who somehow knows everyone, and makes sure things actually ship. Known to his colleagues as Negroni, he brings the same precision to operations as he does to a well-made cocktail.

Vincent K., CTO of Critelligence
Vincent K.
CTO

Vincent K. has founded more companies than he can reliably keep track of — which either says something about his ambition or his filing system. What is consistent across all of them is an instinct for building things that work before the market knows it needs them. At Critelligence he architects the training systems, makes the AI behave, and occasionally remembers where he left the other ventures.

"We are not anti-AI. We are pro-human."

The next decade will sort knowledge workers into two groups. Those who can reason independently under pressure, and those who cannot. The stakes are not just professional — they are civilisational. Critelligence exists to make the first group much, much larger.